The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research. / Furu, Kari; Wettermark, Björn; Andersen, Morten; Martikainen, Jaana E; Almarsdottir, Anna Birna; Sørensen, Henrik Toft.

I: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Online, Bind 106, Nr. 2, 02.2010, s. 86-94.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Furu, K, Wettermark, B, Andersen, M, Martikainen, JE, Almarsdottir, AB & Sørensen, HT 2010, 'The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research', Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Online, bind 106, nr. 2, s. 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00494.x

APA

Furu, K., Wettermark, B., Andersen, M., Martikainen, J. E., Almarsdottir, A. B., & Sørensen, H. T. (2010). The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Online, 106(2), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00494.x

Vancouver

Furu K, Wettermark B, Andersen M, Martikainen JE, Almarsdottir AB, Sørensen HT. The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Online. 2010 feb.;106(2):86-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00494.x

Author

Furu, Kari ; Wettermark, Björn ; Andersen, Morten ; Martikainen, Jaana E ; Almarsdottir, Anna Birna ; Sørensen, Henrik Toft. / The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research. I: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Online. 2010 ; Bind 106, Nr. 2. s. 86-94.

Bibtex

@article{c2a69d2b5c84422baeb91084ff50bc77,
title = "The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research",
abstract = "The Nordic countries have a long tradition of registry-based epidemiological research. Many population-based health registries were established in the 1960s, with use of unique personal identifiers facilitating linkage between registries. In recent years, each country has established a national database to track prescription drugs dispensed to individuals in ambulatory care. The objectives were to present an overview of the prescription databases established in the Nordic countries, as well as to elaborate on their unique potential for record linkage and cross-national comparison of drug utilization. Five Nordic countries collect drug exposure data based on drugs dispensed at pharmacies and have the potential to link these data to health outcomes. The databases together cover 25 million inhabitants (Denmark: 5.5 million; Finland: 5.3 million; Iceland: 0.3 million; Norway: 4.8 million; and Sweden: 9.2 million). In 2007, the registries encompassed 17 million prescription drug users (68% of the total population). We provide examples of how these databases have been used for descriptive drug utilization studies and analytical pharmacoepidemiological studies linking drug exposure to other health registries. Comparisons are facilitated by many similarities among the databases, including data source, content, coverage and methods used for drug utilization studies and record linkage. There are, however, some differences in coding systems and validity, as well as in some access and technical issues. To perform cross-national pharmacoepidemiological studies, resources, networks and time are needed, as well as methods for pooling data. Interpretation of results needs to account for inter-country heterogeneity and the possibility of spurious relationships. The Nordic countries have a unique potential for collaborative high-quality cross-national pharmacoepidemiological studies with large populations. This research may assist in resolving safety issues of international interest, thus minimizing the risk of either over-reacting on possible signals or underestimating drug safety issues.",
keywords = "Databases, Factual, Drug Utilization, Finland, Humans, Iceland, Medical Record Linkage, Pharmacoepidemiology, Prescription Drugs, Registries, Research Design, Scandinavian and Nordic Countries, Journal Article, Review",
author = "Kari Furu and Bj{\"o}rn Wettermark and Morten Andersen and Martikainen, {Jaana E} and Almarsdottir, {Anna Birna} and S{\o}rensen, {Henrik Toft}",
year = "2010",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00494.x",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "86--94",
journal = "Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology",
issn = "1742-7835",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research

AU - Furu, Kari

AU - Wettermark, Björn

AU - Andersen, Morten

AU - Martikainen, Jaana E

AU - Almarsdottir, Anna Birna

AU - Sørensen, Henrik Toft

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - The Nordic countries have a long tradition of registry-based epidemiological research. Many population-based health registries were established in the 1960s, with use of unique personal identifiers facilitating linkage between registries. In recent years, each country has established a national database to track prescription drugs dispensed to individuals in ambulatory care. The objectives were to present an overview of the prescription databases established in the Nordic countries, as well as to elaborate on their unique potential for record linkage and cross-national comparison of drug utilization. Five Nordic countries collect drug exposure data based on drugs dispensed at pharmacies and have the potential to link these data to health outcomes. The databases together cover 25 million inhabitants (Denmark: 5.5 million; Finland: 5.3 million; Iceland: 0.3 million; Norway: 4.8 million; and Sweden: 9.2 million). In 2007, the registries encompassed 17 million prescription drug users (68% of the total population). We provide examples of how these databases have been used for descriptive drug utilization studies and analytical pharmacoepidemiological studies linking drug exposure to other health registries. Comparisons are facilitated by many similarities among the databases, including data source, content, coverage and methods used for drug utilization studies and record linkage. There are, however, some differences in coding systems and validity, as well as in some access and technical issues. To perform cross-national pharmacoepidemiological studies, resources, networks and time are needed, as well as methods for pooling data. Interpretation of results needs to account for inter-country heterogeneity and the possibility of spurious relationships. The Nordic countries have a unique potential for collaborative high-quality cross-national pharmacoepidemiological studies with large populations. This research may assist in resolving safety issues of international interest, thus minimizing the risk of either over-reacting on possible signals or underestimating drug safety issues.

AB - The Nordic countries have a long tradition of registry-based epidemiological research. Many population-based health registries were established in the 1960s, with use of unique personal identifiers facilitating linkage between registries. In recent years, each country has established a national database to track prescription drugs dispensed to individuals in ambulatory care. The objectives were to present an overview of the prescription databases established in the Nordic countries, as well as to elaborate on their unique potential for record linkage and cross-national comparison of drug utilization. Five Nordic countries collect drug exposure data based on drugs dispensed at pharmacies and have the potential to link these data to health outcomes. The databases together cover 25 million inhabitants (Denmark: 5.5 million; Finland: 5.3 million; Iceland: 0.3 million; Norway: 4.8 million; and Sweden: 9.2 million). In 2007, the registries encompassed 17 million prescription drug users (68% of the total population). We provide examples of how these databases have been used for descriptive drug utilization studies and analytical pharmacoepidemiological studies linking drug exposure to other health registries. Comparisons are facilitated by many similarities among the databases, including data source, content, coverage and methods used for drug utilization studies and record linkage. There are, however, some differences in coding systems and validity, as well as in some access and technical issues. To perform cross-national pharmacoepidemiological studies, resources, networks and time are needed, as well as methods for pooling data. Interpretation of results needs to account for inter-country heterogeneity and the possibility of spurious relationships. The Nordic countries have a unique potential for collaborative high-quality cross-national pharmacoepidemiological studies with large populations. This research may assist in resolving safety issues of international interest, thus minimizing the risk of either over-reacting on possible signals or underestimating drug safety issues.

KW - Databases, Factual

KW - Drug Utilization

KW - Finland

KW - Humans

KW - Iceland

KW - Medical Record Linkage

KW - Pharmacoepidemiology

KW - Prescription Drugs

KW - Registries

KW - Research Design

KW - Scandinavian and Nordic Countries

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00494.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00494.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19961477

VL - 106

SP - 86

EP - 94

JO - Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

JF - Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

SN - 1742-7835

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 170602025